InvestorsHub Logo

VVVVVV

09/07/16 7:53 AM

#36346 RE: 110shadow #36345

Well stated! Excellent post. It's funny, how all non believers, are the ones that don't seem to go away.....As I have stated numerous times, no one in their right mind would have purchased these patent (s) prior to the outcome of the infamous IPR Petition, would you? . Unless, of course at a ridiculously low ball offer......Just think, if XYZ company purchased the company and or patents, prior to an IPR decision, they now would have to go through the whole IPR process when they turned around and sued the other infringers.

So, therefore unless an interested party is extremely confident of VPLM's response to both IPR Petitions, they must wait until a decision is made. PERIOD!

Just kind of curious, although I could care less, what does anyone expect VPLM to do more? Huh?

invergaard

09/07/16 3:12 PM

#36356 RE: 110shadow #36345

On second thought, if these patents have ALREADY changed the world, and as of now there is no validation from that change having taken place, then it seems logical that the percentages are against VPLM suddently reversing gears and becoming as valuable and disruptive as they think they are.

Anyone with millions of shares should be quite concerned about their "investment" at this point in time, but again, if anyone can honestly state they are 100% unanimously convinced the goodies are the real deal, then by all means hold those shares tightly.