"Fact is that there were no infections for over a year, as opposed to several a month before AS treatment."
Fact is
Medizone has NO published studies showing even a 1% reduction in HAI infection rates let alone 100% reduction.
Any attempt to derive a HAI reduction figure (eg 100%), after treating a 14-bed ward on Sills 4 at QHC Belleville INSIDER Hospital, so as to be able to extrapolate future HAI reductions is FLAWED & STATISTICALLY INVALID
-----
No infections for over a year on the 14-bed ward ...
Shannon (December 19 2012)
The reality below is in stark contrast to the fantasy above!
-----
Published Study:
Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor Enhances Hospital Disinfection of Superbugs
Results showed that the enhanced cleaning reduced by 64 percent the number of patients who later became contaminated with any of the most common drug-resistant organisms.
Some 6,350 patient admissions to JHH were closely tracked as part of the two-and-a-half-year analysis, as patients moved into and out of 180 private hospital rooms. Almost half the rooms received enhanced cleaning with hydrogen peroxide vapor in between patients, while the rest did not.
The current study had only sufficient numbers to statistically validate the paired unit's effectiveness against VRE.
NOT ONE (1) SALE TO A HOSPITAL NOR ONE (1) HOSPITAL SERVICE CONTRACT HAS BEEN REPORTED, WORLDWIDE (The manufacture of the first production unit was announced back in April 2012)
"My main point was that his claim that those twenty deaths wouldn't have been prevented by AS is meaningless and totally irrelevant."
PATENTLY FALSE & TOTALLY MISLEADING
No one ever claimed "twenty deaths"
I would have thought that the distinction between a dead patient and a patient with a Hospital Acquired Infection ("twenty tested positive for MERS") was blatantly obvious? Obviously not!
AGAIN:
--------------------
"No one ever claimed, as his post implied, that AS is a cure for people who are already infected."
PATENTLY FALSE & TOTALLY MISLEADING
Any suggestion that hydrogen peroxide and ozone is a "cure for people" that have a Hospital Acquired Infection (HAI) is beyond absurd - it's laughable. Kill pathogens and the patient, what a novel idea.
-----
January 28, 2011
Joan Harrigan-Farrelly Director Antimicrobial Division Office of Pesticide Programs U.S Environment Protection Agency
Dear Ms. Harrigan-Farrelly:
On behalf of the Association for Professionals in Infection Prevention (APIC), the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association for the Healthcare Environment (AHE) formerly ASHES, we welcome the opportunity to comment on the topic of fogging applications for disinfectants. The issues are very pertinent to our organizations and we are responding collectively to reinforce our close agreement on mutual concerns, especially worker safety.....When used properly, HP also likely offers a greater margin of safety compared to other chemicals that can also be applied by vapor such as chlorine dioxide or ozone.(Davies A, 2011, in press JHI)
7. Are there any active ingredients that may be problematic for your facility as foggers?
Ingredients that affect OSHA exposure limits that may affect workers, especially agents such as formaldehyde or phenol-based agents, would be a concern. The latter were chemicals that stimulated investigation and ultimately specific recommendations against their use by CDC. Other chemicals such as chlorine dioxide and ozone also have many documented safety issues that would preclude their use in healthcare facilities.(Davies,JHI2011)