I'll agree that he isn't always correct, but, I have a question related to a comment you made on another board. I'm making it here since it would be off topic on the other one.
If their ph III trials were successful, why does it state the primary endpoints weren't met on their website.
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed w/prejudice. If Lead Plaintiffs wish to file a Second Amended complaint, they shall file a motion for leave to amend in accordance with the Local Rules no later that 2/24/16. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 2/10/16. (sr, ) (Entered: 02/10/2016)
I haven't been following here and only ask due to your comments elsewhere.
I'd love to catch it on a low if in fact he's wrong on this one.
In Reply to '2014turnaround' LOL he's usually correct you say? I could name 20 companies he was wrong about in the last 5 years alone!