InvestorsHub Logo

vietvetharry

08/24/16 11:41 PM

#51721 RE: Snizzle #51720

Sorry Snizzle, I wouldn't go that far. He might have been naïve and misguided by unsavory manipulators, and like the rest of us has lost in the long run.
At this point I believe he is trying to salvage his company, but I am afraid it is at the detriment of his original faithful and founders.

jazz_1

08/25/16 6:49 AM

#51723 RE: Snizzle #51720

No. I believe the product of ink is out-dated and the business model is wrong. Get the ink in the stores and/or develop other products of interest. Don't rely on individual investment especially when there is no window of ROI. The only thing the company ever should have asked for is for people to invest in company shares IF the sales proved to be good. That way they go from good to great. The founder's units, 506 purchase, Bit Coin, additional share purchase, and now activation on top of a non growth in the price per share, the dividend restriction from several years ago and multiple reverse splits is too much. Still, unfortunately we are at the same place.

Not good. Plus I've sent in many ideas that were never implemented. Maybe one day. Not today. The company needs money but it should not be from us. That well is dry. Angel/capital investors or bank loans should be the company's source of income.

-Jazz