Replies to post #66674 on Revolutionary Concepts Inc (fka REVO)

[Sumdude]

why would there be? this is longs DD not mine.. the DD is clear.

your CEO Ron Carter is directly subverting REVO shareholder ownership of new and continuation patents directly to a company that they made up in the 1st place in order to take the patents away from REVO.. or in other words you..

how could longs remotely be cool with that?

basically what happened is.. hey buy our stock we have great patents.. then later..

ya know what ill just make a new company pretend im not involved in it at all so shareholders don't get pissed and give them the patents... eyetalk paid ZERO dollars. and now Ron works for eyetalk.. putting in work for them meanwhile hes done nothing to get REVO back to running? what did you pay im for? I thought he worked for REVO.?

[Krysti]

You're correct Skeet. Eyetalk365 doesn't benefit REVO shareholders.

Any income generated by the REVO patents has been received by Eyetalk365, but Eyetalk365 has no reporting obligations to REVO shareholders. And REVO directors have refused to meet their reporting obligations.

As a result REVO shareholders know absolutely nothing about income received by, or from, Eyetalk365.

As you correctly point out:

So there is no benefit for REVO share holders if eyetalk365 does good or makes money .

There is no benefit to REVO shareholders because the REVO directors are keeping the money for their own benefit.

Simple.

[Just1MoreUpTick]

NO! revo is an illiquid grey market stock, end of story...

So there is no benefit for REVO share holders if eyetalk365 does good or makes money .