InvestorsHub Logo

Magnus1

08/22/16 12:16 PM

#123709 RE: arvitar #123705

If that was really the case...anyone believing that would have moved on long ago...it's almost as useless as posting charts referencing 2009 timelines...

www.nanoviricides.com would be a good starting point to acquire some current information on NNVC...it's like comparing the 10 most popular phones from 2009 with what folks have in hand today. Look at the current timeline on NNVC website...this timeline is post manufacturing facility...the 2009 timeline is before manufacturing facility. This is important because NNVC concluded they would be unable to find a third party to manufacture the backbone micelles to their standards resulting in the decision to create their own pilot plant (which Diwan design/built/paid for and then sold to NNVC at cost).

This did create a huge setback but will ultimately lead to a better company with potential for massive profits. Personal attacks on the Doc's are obviously apropo here, but are hardly conducive to conversation about the tech, science or progress of the company...most folks simply choose not to engage and instead wait patiently for news of progress. WP & B university results are on the way as well at the Annual Reports...this is the kind of information investors look for as they try to avoid the rest.