Point by point on your statements:
Tianjin is a Chinese company that approached ROTH about distributing Sucanon in China. It was announced as material information at the time. Unlike Canagen in India where there is a contractual agreement, this was an early informal agreement which did not result in a distribution and sales relationship. This news, to be clear, is at least 2 years old.
Regarding scams and fraudsters, it is relevant that attorney Lehrman cited below along with her policeman husband were subjects of a RICO action for fabricating complaints against a company she was taking legal action against. Renuen (now out of business) brought a federal lawsuit against attorney Lehrman and her policeman husband for fabricating claims against the company that were traced to his computer at the police station. To be clear, I don't have opinions on whether Renuen for example was a scam or not, and the minute details are not relevant to ROTH. I am however pointing out that I personally give much greater weight in my DD to verifiable information than I do to baseless opinions or worse yet anonymous accusations with an agenda, of which the apparently fabricated Renuen claims could serve as one example.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
