I apologize for coming across condescending as it was not my intention.
I have often wondered whether management was up to something darker. Like did a major company somehow pursued them to not sell their products for a period of time.
Then I step back and ask myself why the steps to change things? First Sonny cleans house focuses on efficiency. Then he puts focus on building word or mouth through scientific publications & presentations at the various forums. Late last year into this year they've been gathering scientific data to back their claims and now they are signing new distributors and ramping up for more sales. That to me is a successful model to change course.
The moves they are making tells me a different story then a lot of people seem to claim. Does that mean they couldn't have shorted all along? Of course they could have shorted. Where that becomes an issue is did they short because they knew things would take time to change or did they short because they had little intention of changing things? Evidence suggests the first.
I am not in love with the company. I like the products, particularly CsC. I want this company to succeed because my dad has had 5 spinal surgeries already and will likely need an implant on next. My mother has a deteriorating Hip and will eventually need replacing. Its for selfish reasons, but I also want others to have access to these, especially CsC because of how much better it is over the current standard of bonegrafts & infuse.
Yes I want to make money, who doesn't. It is not the most important thing to me and Im not one of those people who will sacrifice their core values to make money. Usually people who do that are miserable.
Oh and as nice as 400-500% sounds, if we keep dropping, 500% is 2.5. Unless you mean 400-500% over the offering price.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
