InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kingpindg

08/17/16 11:34 AM

#9793 RE: emdyal #9791

Here you go, e...


https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/799235/000114036114020872/ex10_1.htm



And, after thinking about it, I don't believe that the footnote in the 10Q is inconsistent with the Farm Out Agreement. This is because the only exploration costs that ERHC is obligated to pay, at this point, are those up to and including the First Additional Exploration Period, and those costs are being carried as described by the footnote.




.
icon url

tryoty

08/17/16 6:00 PM

#9803 RE: emdyal #9791

That exact verbiage was in the last filing as well, word for word.

It isn't something new.