Please ask yourselves this. Do you find it strange that all of rupperts debts and conversions were well documented in the financials and disclosure statements however kakiskys notes, debts, lawsuit and 3a10 judgement don't show up in the year end or quarterlys anywhere. And both signed by Tom Kim as the CEO. Not one mention of a lawsuit that had been filed by Kalisky things that make you hummmm
Can't blame Ruppert for that obvious intentional bad reporting