InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

biopharm

08/03/16 9:33 PM

#269548 RE: ststephensrevenge #269547

Absurd... seems that you are saying that all BOD shall be trustworthy. More Big Pharma execs have been tossed from their positions ( or to be politically correct they resigned ..) due to wrongdoings than we know and the one point CP seems to be making is KEEP THEM HONEST. All are watching and it's obvious that some puzzle pieces have been hidden from shareholders...

IO biomarkers is gold right now....and I bet the competition wished they knew if their biomarkers development falls right into the hands of Peregrine
icon url

The Other Guy

08/04/16 10:15 AM

#269562 RE: ststephensrevenge #269547

A letter from shareholders will have little effect. A lawsuit may catch the attention of the BOD.
icon url

Protector

08/04/16 5:43 PM

#269601 RE: ststephensrevenge #269547

stephen, we don't by anything for that kind of BoD/management targeted comments.

My assessment (and that is a PERSONAL ASSESSMENT) of the/my PPHM investment is that we sit on a gold mine if we do NOT GET DILUTED by a SHELF LEVERAGE 5 to 1 or 10 to 1. If our shares remain % wise what they are today and we make Mid-2017 everybody will stop complaining.

And strangely enough, SUNRISE would ALSO have been Mid-2017 so the new plan doesn't give us that much delay. However, SUNRISE Chemo would have brought in more cash/leverage in the very short term after approval.

Now we will have MORE total leverage but it will be a slower curve. Investing is a PERSONAL business so I prefer the more and slower over less and sooner. However I RESPECT ALL that think otherwise or are in a situation where time is an ISSUE. I therefore understand that many people on here are disappointed because, just like me by the way, they planned for the short term SUNRISE revenue and what that would do to the PPS.