Replies to post #28488 on Conversion Solutions Holdings (fka CSHD)

[homieg340]

LOL

I have been in this stock since that interview, and believe me, I would love for what Rufus said to come true. He just needs to stop acting so sure about himself when he sets deadlines (Aug 1) and price targets ($15). He leaves no extra room for error.

And to say that someone who does not believe in Rufus is a Bas**** is such a great argument. Especially on a forum where discussions about a stock are to be open. To believe in Rufus is a folly as well, if you do not realize it. All you should base your stock picks on is fact and DD, NEVER HOPE or TRUST in anyone. I am still in this stock, just getting dissapointed as I'm sure man are if you look at today's volume.

If the old deadlines will not work, then we need to be given newer, reasonable ones.

[bbbmine]

Nice post.

I couldn't agree more.

[berge]

what exactly is his reputation? and if anyone really believed someone is selling $15 certs for $1 each....wouldn't this logically already be near $15? what will happen to value the company at $15/share? I have not found anything that would do that.

[bluediamonds]

Nice post, on Rufus, dashrip417!

Mr. Rufus Harris' interview on MN1 is in the red box on the left hand side at http://www.mn1.com/

----------------

Posted by: dashrip417
In reply to: None Date:8/3/2006 11:17:38 AM
Post #of 28479

If you listened to the entire MN1 interview and

you disbelieve what Rufus said, then you are one cynical b*****d.

He said in that interview that he is putting his reputation and professional life on the line with this merger and $15 valuation of the converted stock, and that this merging with FHAL was a cheaper way to go public than an IPO.

If the hardcore skeptics and bashers are right about Rufus and he is the boldest-faced liar in SEC history, good for you -- your guarded cyncism will win you the right to crow "I told you so" for however long you choose.

But if you cynics are wrong -- and I believe that you are very much wrong about what is happening in this very unique situation here -- you're missing out on one heck of strong buying opportunity while the clock ticks.


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12428415

[BuzzOnDaBeach]

If the company has such an enormous asset base, why would they need to choose the "cheapest" route for taking the company public? There are numerous advantages to choosing the traditional IPO route versus the reverse merger into an OTC shell, such as listing on a major exchange, institutional support for the stock price, choosing the IPO price, and instant analyst coverage. Since you're asking yourself questions, ask yourself if the company would have held up under the scrutiny needed for legitimate IPO underwriting, and major exchange listing.

As for "boldest-faced liar in SEC history", not even close. I'm not stating at this point that he has or hasn't lied about anything. However, if the promises do not come to fruition, he wouldn't even be close. I suggest you look at the history of ECNC, BIFS, PCBM, and of course, the "million millionaires" CMKX to name a few.

There's nothing at all unique about this situation. It's another case of an OTC/pink making huge promises that, 99.9% of the time, seem to fall through for one reason or another.

Buzz