Their management has always been excellent, imo. Keith Murphy COO and Barry Michaels, CFO. They had hedge fund support very early. (Trask Ventures) If Sigma can develop that kind of team and present via a third party (TED for ONVO, America Makes for SGLB) it will benefit the shareholders. Still long both common.
Silver. I sincerely hope that you do make it to Albuquerque sometime in the near future. It would be a real treat to have a beer (or several) with you and see if there is possibly anything at all that we can agree upon (other than the fact that we have some outstanding micro breweries here that I'm certain you would enjoy). One would think that two relatively intelligent people looking at the prospects for a security would find something (anything) to agree upon. When I read your postings I wonder whether we are even discussing the same stock. You appear confident that an uplisting to the NASDAQ is going to bring in a host of institutional buyers. I'm doubtful that they will even have enough subscribers to satisfy the offering. Without a major contract/sales announcement this offering is going to have to be priced at bargain rates to get anyone at all to purchase shares. The offering is yet another dilution of shareholder value without a clear path to profitability. I'm beginning to feel more and more certain that there will be no "carrot" of a major order or contract to accompany the planned upgrade. Any order of this significance cannot be "sandbagged" to the 12th of August. The SEC requires prompt disclosure and we would be aware within a matter of a few days.. We know that there were no "significant" orders/contracts in Q-2 because they would have had to announce those as well. While I sincerely hope that I am mistaken this "upgrade" is shaping up to be another disaster for shareholders orchestrated by an unbelievably naive Mark Cola who needs to have the management reins jerked from his hands and placed with someone who knows how to run an enterprise.
Silver, Onvo has been my case study; thus, I personally think that it is fairly relevant. There are a number of comparisons such as being 1) Being a 3D play 2) Being listed in OTC 3) Doing a reverse split 4) S-1 filing 5) dilution of shares 6) Being a company with a ton of potential but no significant revenues yet
I've mentioned before that SGLB is following a very similar path to uplist.
They did a private placement on the OTC to raise funds just like SGLB did.
I think just like you that the uplisting to the NASDAQ will deliver a pop to the pps as the big boys will be able to play. Should a major contract announcement come then SGLB is off to the races!! GLTU dot + dot + dot = Success!!