InvestorsHub Logo

silversmith

07/30/16 12:15 PM

#44160 RE: alanthill #44156

Well said Alan. Flip your coin, dude.
And in case the many here haven't made the connection yet, if you are of the belief that SGLB is off to the races, the more you own now, the less the number of shares to sell as units; assuming that all your new purchases will indeed raise the share price. Put the profit in your own pocket, or share it with new investors. Your call.

All the best,
Silversmith

silversmith

07/30/16 12:33 PM

#44161 RE: alanthill #44156

Alan,
One difference in belief that I have with your post, is about the failure of the offering if no contract coincides.
The reason for the difference is because the offering only will go live on the NASDAQ; a whole different kind of investment base.
When you inspect the structure and operations of the AM group stocks traded on the big boards, they clearly show early phase company characteristics of no profits, growing capital expenditure, and large multiples. All of them, without exception, show this. Yet the shares are generously priced. That is because the more sophisticated investors in the stocks are just that- investors. They have bought and held for the potential and expectation of growth.
I expect that the same will be the case for SGLB on the NASDAQ. So I personally feel that the coincidental contract is not necessary, but it sure would be sweet. And I do feel that if one is not coincidental, one does need to occur within the next three or four quarters.

All the best,
Silversmith