Yeah cause he has always done exactly what he said he would do and has never screwed anyone (except the guy suing him)
Actions? Like what? adding a friend to the team so he can collect too?
He wouldn't be attacked if he made an effort to inform the shareholders of any effort he has put out. Unfortunately he doesn't make an effort to inform anyone and when he does its no different than Scotts "effort"
"Coming soon" is all anyone can get. Could it be that a Director that promises transparency, a 43-101 with a resource estimate is attacked because he has done nothing even close to what he said?
Its been especially lacking ever since he said he would supply it.
It was pretty obvious to me which is why I have been saying Scott needed to go for 5 years. It must have been unclear to you but that happens any time you ignore the facts.
Dan spent 12-18 months finding out that he cant do anything any better than Scott could because the company is not in any way capable of becoming what longs dream of.
Dan has accomplished 1 thing in a year and a half. Drilling 1 hole in the wrong place.