Replies to post #39881 on Tautachrome Inc (TTCM)

[PatB1]

Kashkat...you don't know how wrong you are. It's not my fault that other people use my words (which are true and accurate) to further their causes. I am who I am and nothing more. I have always supported the idea and potential of this company, I just don't support the management. And the latest PR is all the proof I need to show that I am right. They may be brilliant in technical areas, but they do not know how to run a business and make it successful. They have proved it to us.

I believe there are three types of companies on the pink sheets.

1. Total scam. Only sells shares to make money for the company officers. Total disregard for the shareholders. No plan except for the next P&D to sell shares.

2. Legit company. Wants to do the right thing. Has one or more products and a strategy. Has good intentions for the shareholders and wants to move past the pink sheets one day. But does not know how to do it, and makes a lot of mistakes along the way, which negatively influences the share price.

3. Legit company. Knows how to do the right thing. Makes steady progress to get to the next level. Communicates well with shareholders. Has a strategy AND a tactical plan to make progress. Executes well and makes it successful.


TTCM is in the number 2 category. If I was really the pirate, I wouldn't give them that much credit. Management of TTCM has to realize their limitations and bring in people who know how to execute and run a company. That is the bottom line.

[1~Eye~Jack!!]

~ ttcm = & DEBT INTEREST is rRrISING..BADLY!! :-(

PatB1

Rebranding in this case is not good. It doesn't have anything to do with whether it's 'working'. The fact is they infringed on another companies app and, although they tried to buy themselves out of it, the other company was asking for more than they were willing to give up ( the one thing that 1-eyed-jack was right about). Thus, they have to rebrand so they don't get sued for infringement. Let's be real here, guys. The company royally screwed the pooch. Not a good indication of a well managed company.

10K
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=71892844

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $451,804 for the year ended December 31, 2015 versus $1,920 for the same period in 2014.

.0030's Coming,, Again,, Soon!! :-(

...Prolly even w.000rSe!! :-(

...so...sad... :-(

[1~Eye~Jack!!]

~ ttcm = & DEBT INTEREST is rRrISING..BADLY!! :-(

PatB1

Rebranding in this case is not good. It doesn't have anything to do with whether it's 'working'. The fact is they infringed on another companies app and, although they tried to buy themselves out of it, the other company was asking for more than they were willing to give up ( the one thing that 1-eyed-jack was right about). Thus, they have to rebrand so they don't get sued for infringement. Let's be real here, guys. The company royally screwed the pooch. Not a good indication of a well managed company.

10K
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=71892844

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $451,804 for the year ended December 31, 2015 versus $1,920 for the same period in 2014.

.0030's Coming,, Again,, Soon!! :-( UPDATE,, THE .0030'S ARRRE HerRre NOW!! :-(

.000's Coming,, Again,, s.000n,, Now, because of this PR!! :-(
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124032959

...so...sad... :-(