Replies to post #50311 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[Ezal1]

This was on Yahoo...it is about Steve stepping down as CEO.

http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/news/2016/07/19/2-austin-public-company-ceos-step-down-as-c-suite.html

[Hal44]

Very interesting, in your opinion (or others) how much effect might UbiQD have on QTMM and how does their stated apparent technology of low cost, high performance & no cadmium QD's compare with QTMM's technology?

I realize many other factors come into play, capitalization, industry support/recognition, mgmt, long lead times between research and revenues etc. Thanks

[j45]

From UbiQD website:
"There are many applications that the company is considering including safety, industrial design, solar energy, solid-state lighting, biotechnology, art, cosmetics, security, sensors, and non-destructive testing. In general, UbiQD will supply QDs to companies in these or other areas. In the four applications selected below, UbiQD is more active in developing partnerships, building demonstrations, and filling intellectual property. Click on your area of interest for more details."

4 areas are Non destructive testing, art and design, security inks and Solid state lighting.

Looks like ZERO focus on displays!

[Long-vestor]

UbiQD $700,000 angel investors in comparison to QTMM's YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Accumulated deficit Of -$23,677,301. And to put that in terms of common stock expense between insider and Toxic loan ('angel investors') it's an understatement to cite that the stock they flipped @ twice the money plus through the years: 23,677,301 + 23,677,301 = $47,354,602. Only 47.3 million?

UbiOD offers an extremely attractive debt profile while QTMM wallow's in the mud near a decade of dilution, fantasies and hype to the tune of common stock cost/debt in a 47+ Million dollar hole.