InvestorsHub Logo

sweetlou

07/15/16 7:24 PM

#6405 RE: Jayyy #6404

You state "The facts about this scam: Dumping shares at a price just above where the unlocking of restrictions has taken place for insiders" is false. Post backup for your claim.

Now on to the statement which is a modification of the original quote with the prices changed "from $.001 and .003" which is still inaccurate based on the filings as no stock sales have occurred below .003 and many significantly above. Here was the previous statement that has been repeatedly challenged and disproven:

"I believe that this is true "The fact that over the years it has printed hundreds of millions of shares at fixed prices ranging from $0.001 and $0.002, all while being traded between $0.005 and $0.01 goes a long way towards revealing ROTH's true colors as well." MARKS HIDE YOUR $$"

Your quote is modified from hotstocked.com, which is inaccurate and may in fact be the real fraud. Note also in #5 above that You continue to stand behind verifiably false information below which can be disproved based on the reported stock sales and prices at otcmarkets.com in the supplemental financials.

"The fact that over the years it has printed hundreds of millions of shares at fixed prices ranging from $0.001 and $0.002, all while being traded between $0.005 and $0.01 goes a long way towards revealing ROTH's true colors as well."

This is a direct quote from a Hotstocked article by Dragni Dragnev (February 24, 2016). See the next to last sentence. This sentence has been posted here numerous times.

Here is the link to the complete article:

https://www.hotstocked.com/article/92913/pharmaroth-labs-inc-otcmkts-roth-s-pumps-fail.html#comments

Everyone may be interested to read that Hotstocked may be the real scammers. Here is a link to an article that connects Hotstocked and Enigma Software (makers of Spyhunter) which have the same owners. It is a long article, but I encourage everyone to read it and digest it.

http://stockreich.com/hotstocked-precision-related-company-sued-fraud/

These are not the kind of people I would want to do business with. Everyone should always be careful to be aware of your source as you cannot always believe what you read on the internet. I further encourage all to consult the source documents:
FDA letter, Consumer Reports article, financial statements, published Sucanon studies, preclinical information, and check any information that I post as fact. It is all based on publicly verifiable information.