The Court filing shows a letter where Wallace misrepresented himself as his mother's attorney in a state where he's not eligible to practice law. Amazing!
Wallace is a member of the FL bar. Oops. And he was not representing his mother in litigation. He was not required to be a member of the Fl Bar to send a letter on her behalf to Leinwand. I assume Wallace was the family attorney and had every ethical and legal right to state that he was her lawyer.
And of course, the documents were not forgeries. If they were, Gouge would have objected. He never did. It was EIGHT years ago. marty is just now whining about it.
SHs don't care about a lawsuit eight years ago that spencer lost. They care about spencer who has a fiduciary duty to them, telling them the truth. We'll soon find out if he's lied again. If he has, whining about eight year old papers will not be a useful defense.
I'm not sure if Neil had the best interests of the share holders in mind when he contacted Daya.
Daya walked away from a multi-million business because of something Wallace said? Sure. I'm guessing it's because of something spencer said or did. I doubt Daya cared about something a disgruntled former employee said.
Still waiting for an explanation as to why no PR from the Japanese licensee. (allegedly)
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
