Replies to post #40907 on A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board (AIMUSERS)

[karw]

Hi Ls7550,

Thank you, post 36906 is the right one!

An important thing is that you don't have to be afraid about the cash situation at -50%, -60%, -70% etc.

Initially you allocate shares and cash, and that initial amount is all you can lose. This makes for fearless trading.

What I notice is you can start with small machines, when the price drops, you can add cash and this generates buy signals, increasing the size of the machine in a most natural way. Nicely scaling in.

Also you don't need to have all cash at the start, if you want to use LD-i-AIM in the TCK situation with initial cash $33150 and minimum cash $5452, $27698 is the LD-cash amount needed. $5452 was virtual.

Indeed it is somewhat like a Ben Graham with 50/50 stock/bonds. However because i-AIM is safe, I would imagine to use a more volatile vehicle where a potential 0/100 is not an issue.

Best,K

[SFSecurity]

Hi Is7550, Yep,

I fog over pretty quickly trying to track that trade activity

and I can feel a headache coming on. In the sample given the headings are not quite clear to me. I am assuming that the top ones are for i-AIM and the second line is standard AIM, right?

What we need, it seems to me, is a narrative description of actions to take in various conditions, like Lichello, does in order to understand and be able to actually implement it.

Now, another thought. Since standard AIM never runs out of stock and i-AIM never runs out of cash, perhaps some combination of the two might overcome the limitations of each. At this point i-AIM is too fuzzy for me to see how this might happen.

Best,

Allen