Replies to post #6162 on PharmaRoth Labs, Inc. (ROTH)

[old biohf guy]

Since when does the size of an office mean anything? (in fact a 120 sq ft office is a nice sized office, being about 11 ft x 11 ft).

Since when is it a requirment that the company name be derived from one of its founders? Bill Gates named his company Microsoft, but maybe that was his middle name?...I don't know.

Please list the multiple scam company names and evidence that they are scams. Please provide links to show they are scams if you can.

[sweetlou]

Let's go point by point:
1. ROTH does not "operate" out of CFO Hall's office in Las Vegas. The operations of the company occur in Mexico City, where CEO Lopez directs and contracts for manufacture and sales of Sucanon through distributor MDR, to Similares pharmacies throughout Mexico. As announced, he established an agreement with HSBC bank to finance ongoing Sucanon orders to allow other priorities like the current Sucanon clinical study at Centro Medico ABC Hospital in Mexico City to satisfy Indian regulatory application requirements.

2.You state CFO Hall is at point for filing multiple scams. You previously identified EZJR as one of those scams and misrepresented that company. It has audited sales last year in the neighborhood of $16 million if I remember correctly and has a rapidly growing business of hair extensions that per reviews on multiple sites are of the highest quality and better pricing than the only other competitor with near the quality.

3. NO LABS are necessary at this point other than certified manufacturer and table tee of Sucanon, as the preclinical studies noted in my previous post are already very convincing from a scientific standpoint.

4. NO PHARMA is an egregious misrepresentation as there is a current ongoing Sucanon study at a prestigious Mexico City hospital scheduled for 12 weeks duration. That along with previous impressive study results satisfy the "Pharma" portion.

5. No one named ROTH. Well, when the other arguments aren't very good, I suppose some filler is required.

6. Just a typical fraudulent scheme trying to take advantage of marks. Again, when the evidence is not favorable, this is repeated, along with the following provably false statements and posts:

1. Modifying a Consumer Reports article in post 4477 to falsely indicate Sucanon as one of the supplements warned about improper advertising by the FDA when it was not and has not been sold in the US.
2. Stating that Sucanon in post 3963 contains only inactive ingredients despite the active ingredients being publicly stated, in one location directly above the cut and pasted inactive ingredients listed on the healthcanada website.
3. Misrepresenting the contents of the FDA response letter by leaving out their clear statements that Sucanon is a drug per the food and drug act, that Sucanon has undergone "substantial clinical investigations" as they reference the press release announcing presentation of a 12 week study of Sucanon in prediabetics in which 81% showed normalized HbA1C at the conclusion and that the study was presented at the 2013 EASD annual meeting and the abstract included in the EASD journal.
4. Stating falsely that Canagen (the Sucanon distributor for India, a multinational company) is a fake company and located in a diner.
5. Then stating in post 5014 that "I stand behind all those statements about this indefensible fraud"
6. The stated purpose of the modification to the Consumer Reports article was for "scaring others away" (post 4550)
7. Stated falsely that "HSBC has no substantial agreement with these crooks". The agreement with HSBC was announced in a press release 5/3/2016 and finances ongoing Sucanon orders in Mexico. Further details can be verified by the company as any desire

As always my statements are all publicly verifiable and I encourage any to read the source material