Replies to post #151970 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[es1]

Might have been rude but there is no rule that states I have to ask a nicely to speak the truth.

Dan doesn't say "If someone asks nicely I will answer and he cant possibly expect people to be sweet when they company has ripped them off for years.

Nice has nothing to do with it.

Second, that proves my point that no one has majority power

Actually that is exactly the problem with emailing the company.

The statement did not say that nobody has majority.
It ONLY says Dan doesn't have the power to do what he wants.

But that statement is now "nobody has the majority"

So had you received the same email the board would be told how nobody has majority when that is not at all what he says.

Just to clarify...
If Scott held 75% of the shares the response would be...

I don't have the unlimited authority to do what ever I want or the facts would already have been provided to shareholders.

If Dan and Otto owned 33% each Dans response would be...

I don't have the unlimited authority to do what ever I want or the facts would already have been provided to shareholders.

So his response tells us NOTHING except Dan is not in charge. That's it.

The rest is assumption that this means nobody has the majority.

Third, he stated that he he trying to resolve past issues to forward progress the company (seems like progress, without insider information)

Yes and 4 years ago Scott was trying to resolve past issues to forward progress the company which "seemed like progress".
But then we all know that the assumption was complete crap.

But "its different this time"

Look.... the bottom line is that you may or may not be right. I may or may not be right.

There is no way to tell.... and THAT is the issue.

A legit company has NO ISSUE speaking publically.