It may be about the underlying patents, but it's also about the fact that REVO directors are using Eyetalk365 to avoid sharing proceeds from those patents with REVO shareholders.
REVO directors are not reporting to REVO shareholders. REVO directors are working with Eyetalk365. The patents must have generated some income from court settlements. BUT: neither REVO directors nor Eyetalk365 are reporting any income to REVO shareholders.