Let me get a handle on this. Your new theory is that some people heard otherwise which, since the article said dry hole, "otherwise" would mean they found oil. So armed with this news which according to you and other pundits would make the stock worth $5 or much more, instead of loading up at 5 or 6 cents they decided to perpetrate the publication of a false story so they could buy at 3 cents. In other words buying a stock that was going from 6 cents to $6 wasn't good enough, they really needed it to go from 3 cents to $6. Is that what went on here?
And if the results are "otherwise" from a dry hole, and it has been leaked already, where is the volume? Why is the market cap still so low?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
