Replies to post #4061 on Arcam AB fka AMAVF

[Tom Joad]

Conclusion is not the wrong word. You state clearly that "It may be a long time before we see any appreciable numbers of EBM blades on the LEAPs unfortunately... Its a pity EBM blades were not flight ready for the LEAPs that would have been a terrific shot in the arm for Arcam"

Those an outcomes bub. Those are conclusions. Your conclusions based on little information. One conclusion has "may" before it but "may" is a word used before all probabilistic statements, that is, anything anyone says about anything in the market.

I have little patience for noise, or the myriad pump and dump schemes I see. The latter is no less than proof of treachery, a sin worthy of the 9th circle.

[pdb2]

Trader, what else would you call the process: You take the length of time a leap engine will fly (premise) and then shout that because of the length there will be less need for leap blades. Conclusion????. What else would you call it.

For some one who doesn't read my posts you sure comment on them and know what ive been saying. Plus how can you avoid them?? But you couldn't even get the initials right unless it was just a typo and i'm kind of the typos, LOL

Yep it takes room and time to show all the false conclusions, some new, some repetitive examples. I don't just say a engine flys x amount of time so they will need y amount of blades without considering all the variables. Or hint re conclusion based on what I see/don't see in a video. Just like 30 leaps does not equate to volume production. I explain my conclusins