LOL... FM 11, that is funny.
Yes, I use that phrase all the time. I have also stated why I use it so often.
If someone comes on here and says Breitling Energy gave free shares to BOD appointees, I am simply stating that it is wrong and SEC disclosure statements show it.
If someone comes on here and says that Breitling was dumping shares on the way up or down after they went public, SEC docs show it is not possible because those shares were restricted.
In fact, publically available information shows Faulkner buying shares during the time when multiple posters who didnt bother to read the filings, claimed he was dumping them.
If someone else comes on here and makes the claim of Breitling being around for 8 or 9 years and being public for at least five, I know it is incorrect and have directed people to the appropriate filings to see for themselves.
If someone claims that Breitling admitted to participating in a stock promotion, or that I am an insider, stock promoter or troll, I can LOL at that as well.
All of the sudden though, some people want to claim that these facts are irrelevant.
How convenient, after they have easily been shown to be false.
I am not the one regurgitating these arguments, yet I am constantly criticized publically and privately for simply responding to them.
I have said for months that these are dumb arguments to have and an epic waste of everyones time.
Just saying that the public information shows that Chris Faulkner seems to have done everything in his power to protect Breitling Energy shareholders by maintaining the integrity of the share structure.
IMO and FWIW.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
