Replies to post #48777 on Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[chessmite]

Your response seemed more of a slide, w/o any comment on questions like; "If other companies are going to be brought into the conversation here, don't you think that one should include their pov and supportive data as to why they think it's relevant?"

This was very clearly stated:

1. All things QDot is news today. It all affects investors perception of QMCs value as a company.
....Ok, Exactly how did the sale of DOTZ affect the perception of Nanosys, QD Vision, Nanoco, or QMC?
....as long as it's qd news right? Optics, electronics, pharma, display...just anything qd affects perception, (even research papers).

2. "Discounting news about the market is basically saying you don't evaluate the worth of your investment."
....it seems like your objective opinion doesn't take into consideration whether one uses technical, fundamental analysis, or a combination.

3. "Whereas that might be how you mans your investments," ...meaning me, from your pov or as a possibility
"the rear of us evaluate market, financials, and commercial success to determine what companies we bet and when to sell."
....stated quite clearly as a fact; so I asked specifically, "Exactly how many of the companies involved w/QDs at Display Week have you evaluated their financials, products, and commercial success?"

I am aware of perception, so yes, I'd like to know the relevance of the DOTZ sale to QMC's current path, (as this msg bd is about Quantum Materials Corp).

I'm also aware of the perception by some, that when QMC does a PR we often get an influx of news about other companies qd progress.
Being objective and the voice of reason, would you care to postulate as to why some have that perception?

DK about others, but I find it ironic that in the course of being objective, some ignore research papers.....research papers upon which applications evolve and that businesses are built upon. Will a business evolve from every research paper? No, but every stone isn't a diamond either.
One would have thought, the objective pov would have been: It's good to be aware.

Research applications, (and the inherent potential thereof) are sometimes available to an interested party.