InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nazulya

05/23/16 4:44 PM

#56285 RE: Intotheblack #56284

The company structure: (Equity based Accretive Acquisition) Bears will argue this until they are blue in the face, that it's killing this, the market has spoken, you can't etc etc etc... skipping record. The facts are simply the business used equity to grow, and at some point the PPS/Market cap needed to catch up with the OS. I's done that, it will continue to do that. If Nelson continues to use Equity, I'm sure it will be a deal that's in the best interest of the company, AND the shareholders, as he has fiduciary responsibility to do this.



It is not "accretive aqusition" model, it is a toxic dilution because:
1. In "accretive acquisitions", they don't dilute a $2 stock to death like they do in SUNW
2. In "accretive acquisitions", share price doesn't collapse like it does at SUNW
3. "Accretive acquisitions" don't require toxic and hugely discounted notes to enrich close friends and others, all happened in SUNW
4. "Accretive acquisitions" don't require cheesy and cheap promotions to unload new shares on unsuspecting retail, all of it present here, happens all the time at SUNW
5. "Accretive acquisitions" don't extract the value from common shareholders of SUNW, true "accretive acquisitions" actually add value for common shareholders since their holdings appreaciate in value.
6. Holders of toxic notes from "accretive acquisitions" don't carefully time their dumps to run ups to maximize their profits and they don't rid of shares the following day like there is no tomorrow like the holders of SUNW
7. In a normal sense "accretive acquisitions" always take place in established companies with strong insiders' and large institutional ownership. All of it absent in SUNW

Therefore what is called "accretive acquisitions" in an normal sense, is a skillful cover up for a toxic dilution in the case of SUNW which totally destroys shareholder's value and share price collaplse under millions of new shares printed non-stop. imo