InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Solar_Express

05/21/16 2:32 PM

#48674 RE: Long-vestor #48672

Organic Growth/Significant Revenue FACT
icon url

Kinnaree

05/21/16 7:28 PM

#48676 RE: Long-vestor #48672

We need a first Coconut that's falling from the tree, harvesting and selling on the market
icon url

j45

05/21/16 8:43 PM

#48677 RE: Long-vestor #48672

These GUESSES are all wrong. Don't you think if management delayed options once they'll do it again if required with all the upcoming potential?

There are NO HIDDEN CONVERTIBLE CONTRACTS so that false claim will not fly.

If the company raised the authorized IF needed I believe that would have zero impact based on the progress of the company.

This management team has run this on a grass roots effort and shoestring budget, why would they all of a sudden after 8 years change their style?? THEY WOULDN'T!

The cleansing and prepping of this company for an eventual Nasdaq up listing is coming so your right about the NASDAQ UPLIST LV!!

But the rest is false.
icon url

Jamis1

05/21/16 10:46 PM

#48678 RE: Long-vestor #48672

What my you fail to or seen to fail to acknowledge is the "shareholder authorized" part of the 10Q paragraph for which you quote. Count up managements current shares. They are not a majority owner. With all their shares combined, I believe they only had about 35-40% or less my last count.
icon url

the exterminator

05/22/16 12:43 AM

#48682 RE: Long-vestor #48672

I don't have a problem with a reverse split. The valuation is still the same.
No big deal.