InvestorsHub Logo

HopScotch2

05/20/16 5:56 PM

#1106 RE: IPO$ #1105

Was there a change of auditors? How is this possible?

juliet-nyc

05/21/16 9:49 PM

#1114 RE: IPO$ #1105

Do not mislead people. The $12.5mm has been in SEC filings since 2014. Your post is false and misleading and it shows that in the filings (the $12.5mm was booked from a stock issuance or control under F-7 and note 5) as that was and has been filed since March 31, 2014 with the sec.gov and on otcmarkets http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10097695.

The new restatement is because ETST has been accepted by one of the largest auditing firms in the nation which is great news for longs and ETST. Obviously they wanted them to restate a minor adjustment if you read the explanation paragraph and adjustments it states it there. This is actually all great news for longs and ETST as a company.

BeastmodePenny

05/22/16 8:59 PM

#1120 RE: IPO$ #1105

Hmm, can you explain the accounting error?