Replies to post #3915 on Breitling Energy Corp fka BECC

[mackfish]

LOL reaper, so now you are saying Breitlings filings are credible? That's hogwash. Just who is or who are the idiot bloggers that would believe that statement? For sure, Yugos, invisible ink and Picante all have more credibility than this effing mess of muddy water you love to play in. Congratulations for your ability to paint a rosy picture of a pile of crap. I suggest a grey color for your following attempt. Poupon?

[FM II]

It doesn’t mean that you can assume that Faulkner sold $8M in royalty interests

I would suggest that I can make that assumption, but I didn't.

Can you tell me how many royalty interest percentages were sold on any given prospect?

Yes, but it is immaterial to anything I said and, therefore, not worth looking up.

how you can pretend to know the amount of capital raised through private equity funding?

I can pretend to know, but I never did. I simply explored the implications of a statement by a poster. I often do that with your posts.

FM "never claimed to be an oil and gas expert" II

[Peterpan254]

Easy test. Revenue generated by breitling vs wells filed with the tracking. Based on public information reported revenue/wells gives you the rate. Agreed the Financials are no good, but that means revenue is understated,

[johnny46]

Can you?