InvestorsHub Logo

hedge_fun

05/07/16 2:21 PM

#46794 RE: nodummy #46793

They tell the Judge he violated the Injunction he.....

agreed to, yet they violated the agreement they agreed to. I will post the latest motion in my next post. It contains the 3rd and final agreement, by my count and requires SFRX hand over the documents.

It's worth noting that Huffman, being the idiot he is, filed a Motion to Quash on behalf of SFRX for a Subpoena Duces Tecum (third party) for ClearTrust. SFRX's time to object passed when ClearTrust got the subpoena. And only ClearTrust could object at that point. They failed to do so thinking the Motion to Quash would suffice.

When the moron realized his mistake he filed for a Protective Order. Now he's got it and they don't won't to abide by it.

But they wanted the Defendant jailed because they claimed he violated the Injunction.

What a bunch of losers. Shareholders should demand Kyle step down, though I'm sure he won't as long as he can squeeze another dime out of this POS.

hedge_fun

05/07/16 2:48 PM

#46795 RE: nodummy #46793

Here's the latest motion with the amended agreement......

that SFRX themselves authored. Notice Huffman then failed to sign it or even answer it. Also notice that Michael Thompson, a forensic auditor would be reviewing the documents.

The email thread can be a little tricky to read, as sometimes the first email is at the bottom of the page and the response is at the top. The prior agreement was sufficient, but these CONS just want to kick the can down the road in hopes the road ends at some point.

I will say, if Huffman brought those documents requested to each hearing as he claims, it would have been quite noticeable. It would have likely filled up a filing cabinet drawer, and he would have had to have had a box to bring them all in. One issuance could be 20-30 pages, maybe more. You would include BOD resolutions, the loan documents, what ClearTrust requires, etc. Just 10 stock issuance's could be 200 pages of material, and I would think it would be at least twice that if they raised $1MM plus dollars as they have been annually.

Also note in the email thread Huffman mentions the transfer ledgers ONLY. That might be about 10 pages, but that wasn't all the Defendant ask for.

And he wants them to be review at the hearing ONLY? What a CON job.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/311811962/Motion-to-Compel-SFRX-v-Volentine

Here's more on forensic auditor Michael Thompson.

Forensic / Fraud Investigations

Financial fraud can be highly complex or quite simple. While many times fraudsters take measures to conceal the truth behind the transactions, others simply use techniques that are quite obvious. Cooking the books is quite common an skills people, from CFO's to clerks can be quite skilled and creative.

Thompson & Associates has Atlanta fraud investigators and forensic accountants with both the experience and professional training to investigate the most complex fraud cases. Michael Thompson, founder of the company has testified throughout the United States on numerous fraud cases and has led several large complex investigations. Under his leadership, his team has investigated cases, representing both victims and alleged fraud perpetrators.

The strength of our team is the depth of accounting experience our staff has and the diversity of cases it has undertaken. Our Atlanta forensic accountants create comprehensive audit plans and reports that provide details of complex fraud schemes in ways that are clear and concise.


http://www.atlantacpas.com/Forensic---Fraud-Investigations.html

MorningLightMountain

05/13/16 10:06 AM

#46802 RE: nodummy #46793

well yeah, it's Huffman, well known for scheming penny tickers from the inside, and honored member of a OTC Markets ban:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/research/prohibited-attorney