I am sure I labeled a lot of things as assumptions and I intentionally pointed out it was one report so people would know it was unsubstantiated. Sure it is speculative. Not much else to talk about since BECC went silent.
From what I have seen in publicly available information regarding direct investment opportunities, a stakeholder is buying into a royalty interest percentage in the overall prospect, rather than a single well.
Please provide backup for that. Everything I have read on their early webpages contradicts that. Even the tax "advantages" they tout would not apply under that deal. Oh, that's right, you don't back things up. You are not interested in doing that. You don't answer questions because that would require you having a basis for what you say. Half-truths and false assumptions are better, aren't they?
It is that whole “growth through the drill bit” that Faulkner keeps talking about.
Please alert me if that ever happens, even a small amount.