Replies to post #42636 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[Pisd]

It is also a necessary condition that moderate to high volume runs of high value AM parts begin before there is a justification for the cost of PR3D. I just do not see the pressure to purchase at the moment. GE has barely begun to print nozzles and not in a significant volume.

Players will seek to evaluate before buying and if they are able to negotiate a PR3D to evaluate without purchasing it, why should they tondo so now?

Right, but to extrapolate, why buy or own SGLB NOW?

GL

[alanthill]

"Alan, I do not recall EVER having said that you had your "head in the sand" so I am a bit confused as to why you say " this time" to me." You are quite right Driftin and I apologize. That remark was uncalled for. I get frustrated however reading all the justifications here that are based on little but hopes and dreams with no concrete evidence that any of it is ever going to come to pass. I'm curious Driftin from your perspective how much longer do we go before you begin to doubt the marketability of Printrite? We're at the 20 month mark. Is 24 months reasonable, 30 months? Just when does this "market isn't ready" excuse wear thin? My take is that the window is closing very rapidly for SGLB 6to prove itself as a viable profitable contender. If management is forced to issue additional shares without significant orders in hand the stock is going to sink below $2.00 and it may not be able to recover. Time is rapidly running out.

[criticalnugz]

BEFORE industry will have a need to spend 40 to 50% more than the cost of the machine in order to incorporate INSPECT or DEFORM

This isn't directed at you Driftin, but an open question to whoever...your quote just prompted the question.

Could the cost be an issue? I understand these large companies are able to dump large amounts of money into projects...but they always care about the bottom line. Maybe they're waiting for Sigma to panic as cash dwindles and need to make sales, leading to a lowered cost.