InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mackfish

05/05/16 12:12 PM

#3906 RE: FM II #3905

Yep. While not illegal, it really confuses the average investor. I could mention the advantages of subterfuge and camouflage inherent and would have to assume that those possibilities combined with lack of current filings are sufficient to ground this stock. As an investor, one should have expected wells drilled and cased to be completed in a timely manner. While never seeing a Breitling prospectus or any type of operating agreement between the parties, it's still more than safe to say that SHs have been damaged and folk funding this scenario are likely seeking legal solutions. Can anyone(reaper) post those agreements?