Furthermore, the court still has the case as open because the judge's order was not made final, in writing. Agreements were already made. You're not being told that??? Here's a hint, the judge's name is right "in the palm of your hand." I repeat, AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED and you will find that DD very shortly.
Have you ever asked out right this question, "does Oak River currently have any attachment to TDEY?" You can get only 1 of 2 answers being: (1) NO, or (2) I cannot say ;-) I'm sure that you have not been told "YES." Oh I am sure of that.
wow, wow, wow..... worth a re-read imo. Glossed over this last night but re-read today. This is very interesting on a number of levels. In particular, the "counterpart."
I wonder who that might have been referring to? I seem to recall a post on this board referencing hypothetically helping with EVs legal costs.