InvestorsHub Logo

CashMoneyCarl

04/29/16 8:14 AM

#55057 RE: SandridgeEnergy #55056

Good Morning Sandridge..

Critical thinking should never be confused for crying.



Nice post. I even agree with a lot of it. Again, I guess its a matter of perspective. I did not invest in this company solely on the cell. I was looking for a solar company in general because I believe in the technology and the explosive growth opportunity. I do admit the cell had a small part of why I chose this company, but it was not the only reason.

Therefore, for me anyway and I cannot speak for anyone else, it is easy for me to let go of that part of the company and move on.

I guess what I am hearing from some is, and I am paraphrasing here, is that Jim lied or is lying to us and the cell is a 'never was'? Is that correct?

Chiinkwia1

04/29/16 11:18 AM

#55069 RE: SandridgeEnergy #55056

This long doesn't believe that Jim Nelson has any obligation to explain any business decision to share holders. Nice if he chooses to but not required. All that is required is that he keeps the company profitable. Our rewards will come eventually. He is doing what is required. Unless someone has a 5% or greater stake in the company you have no say in how it is being run. Opinions are free, but that is all they are, free. Otherwise they are of no importance to the success or failure of sunw.