InvestorsHub Logo

Neverending

04/28/16 7:41 AM

#21921 RE: ccraider #21920

PTSC case is not before the PTAB it is in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. How could any PTAB changes made by the Supreme Court regarding how they do their claims construction have an effect on PTSC? The issue in Cuozzo is that the PTAB (the newly set up Patent Trial and Appeals Board created by the 2011 America Invents Act) standard for claims construction is different that the District Courts standards. This might help PTSC but for the fact that the PTAB standards for claims construction are NOT what small patent holders want they want the district court standards and that is why Cuozzo appealed to the Supreme Court. The PTAB had crushed their patent and they wanted that reversed by the Supreme Court. Does anybody actually read these legal filings like Cuozzo or anything from PTSC? Just wondering because it seems like a lot of hope PTSC somehow succeeds without reading any of the vast amount of available information that says they will not.

Neverending

05/16/16 9:41 AM

#21929 RE: ccraider #21920

PTSCs next PR: DELISTING! This is from the CEO statement on the annual meeting telephone call. He said he will put together the details for shareholders regarding the JUNE delisting. Basically the company is IMPOTENT and delisting is imminent. Some brokers may not even let you trade pink sheet stocks which PTSC will be when delisted. Some may charge a fortune to make a trade for you! Better check and then sell folks. Like I mentioned even with a court win, which almost never happens on appeal because appeals courts tend to respect precedent set by district court judges, a win would not get PTSC any money as TPL Alliacene will NEVER give PTSC the vital infringement warning letters and reverse engineering. What is known as a "CLEAR ERROR" standard is applied in appeals courts to over turn district court decisions. SO Judge Grewal and Chhabria would have to be complete idiots to have a PTSC appeal be successful...by the way Grewal is no idiot HE IS AN MIT GRADUATE and his reasoning was very logically laid out!! (I bet nobody actually read it all trusting the pumpers instead is a BAD IDEA).

Sell now folks it is clearly over 4 U.