GFCI..
Roland I was actually being lighthearted,,, But if you add all the reves that were promised by the Jetmotors that were never to be heard from again ( remember they were to help wells produce 25% more oil) this number would be more like the GNP of Saudia Arabia.. but 1,000,000 X $1,000.00 per share is still $1,000,000,000.00 that is what lymec could get off the shorts as they have a corner on the market,,, They are the only ones besides J.Dial that Knows how many shares are out.. I'm willing to bet that there is no ARB and Bloomberg got the numbers wrong.. Of course they could always call the transfer agent to confirm.... Why would you ever say my decimals are off by 1 or 2 and never question how a 3 man tool shop with 200K may be the interest of anyone...Remember lybia becomes a country that any US company may deal with at the end of this year... Also no one has found any information on American Finance except it's officers and this is the funding arm of lymec..When you call lymec at it's different offices does'nt it seem strang that the same woman answers ans says no one else is in the office...
ALSO the root of my coments came from this post..
10 bagger: Pure deduction!
If Bloomberg shows that Lyamec Group (NOT Lyamec Corporation) has made a tender offer to buy 22.5 million shares of Grifco at $2.25 per share, as well as disclose the fact that Lyamec already has an arbitrage position, I must then intelligently deduce that Lyamec's arbitrage position must actually be the remaining balance of Grifco's total number of shares that is both issued and outstanding. You see, 39.68 million shares, which I deduce from their CTBG dividend PRs, minus that 22.5 million shares shown by Bloomberg gives 17.18 million shares that must be held in arbitrage by Lyamec Group.
O' and another thing: I have never claimed to have all of the answers, but I do try to intelligently guess at many of them, given the fact that I have so very little information to make anything more than an intelligent guess. Could my pet theory be just that -- theory? Certainly! But it's NOT so far away from impossible! Why would Bloomberg disclose something that so many would find ludicrous to believe? Again, I don't even pretend to know the intricacies of how these notifications do work, but it would seem strange to me that Bloomberg would go and put out any false or misleading information.
Been_Burned_Before
Now I know you would never question any of the facts in that post,, but if I do it is a rehash.. You should think before you post...hank
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
