Replies to post #19834 on Intellect Neurosciences Inc. (fka ILNS)

[itwillgetbetter]

Yes it is imo.It was ILNS that sued Pfizer.

No they were on the hook cause the license was not terminated per the termination clause or that's my understanding and the patent issued in the summer of 2012 triggered said payment which ILNS took a big cut on what was owed due to needing funds and a projected long legal fight which if allowed imo Shapiro would have slammed dunked it and got a lot more.

To me the license is still in effect cause per the SEC filings ILNS has filed I've read I don't see anything that states they canceled it.Its just the opposite imo.

Its news to me if the patent is expired. I'm still thinking it covers the ongoing trial due to section 1.9 of said license I think that's the section number without doing a lot of reading of said license cause it stated other diseases.

Even Judge Oing said when ones writes a contract they going to make sure it covers everything not just one thing or something like that.

If the patent has expired that's not good news and our MODS sure need to correct the IHUB board above.To me this trial they are doing is like using the same method but I'm not a scientist and not good reading these trials.Maybe someone with knowledge can make since of all this.

I just wonder if Pfizer will ever try to use it again in early stage to treat A.D.not late stage?

[itwillgetbetter]

Also if Pfizer has terminated the license agreement per said termination clause ILNS sure needs to update its website regarding licensed programs again imo.

I might be out of the ball park with blinders on cause now I'm all confused.

http://www.intellectns.com/licensed-programs