InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RPR

04/19/16 3:18 PM

#47508 RE: trevorbc #47507

Yes if Nanosys wants to sue then they need to sue Nitto not QMC(qmc is just a supplier of QD) . Also Nanosys may have 500+ QD patents but the Current fighting is on third party patents that shows how innovative their patents are...:
icon url

BigE1960

04/19/16 3:52 PM

#47512 RE: trevorbc #47507

What does that have to do with the discussion??? Claims were made in #47469 and #47485. They were thrown out there without specificity or supporting data. Reasonably, a request was made for the originator to provide additional information to clarify that claim. Nothing there has anything to do with the sky falling!

I get that we are talking about money and folks are sensitive about gains and losses, but as it has been explained numerous times, not everyone comes here to pump the stock. There are plenty who are interested in objective dialogue regarding pertinent news. Nanosys suing QDV and essentially informing the rest of the QD world that they own certain inventions and plan on protecting them is an important topic. It's not shorters shaking trees, no one is saying the sky is falling or that QMC is in trouble.

Let's be honest, though. None of us know who has the power. Everyone has educated scientists. Everyone has some IP. Everyone has professional legal counsel. No one here is equipped to know which company trumps the others. All we can do is analyze the available data and express opinions. And, at the very least the person expressing their opinion should be able to explain the basis for drawing their conclusions and be able to back them up with some facts.

Once again I ask, isn't that what a bulletin board is for?