InvestorsHub Logo

MFlores

04/04/16 4:35 PM

#32111 RE: Sparklefarkle #32110

... more nonsense...

The sale of Playboy brings little if any "motivation" to settle. In a business sale, if contingencies exist, funds are simply held in an escrow until such a time as the contingencies are settled.

....if your constant claims of Playboy injuring Cirtran, why has not the judge ruled if favor of Cirtran?

... this is going to trial.

investorman85

04/05/16 3:45 PM

#32113 RE: Sparklefarkle #32110

Great stuff here!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2016/04/04/playboy-no-nudes/

Article says Playboy is now...HORRIBLE! Great job rebranding to try and sell..haha in the tanker!!

MFlores

04/06/16 12:11 PM

#32115 RE: Sparklefarkle #32110

The Playsafe vs United Medical Devices should have been a no-brainer also (since Playsafe = Mr. Iehab, had no sales to a single customer) but for some reason the Judge let it go to trial (a jury of peers).

Following a two-week trial, the jury found 12 to 0 against Playsafe on all its claims and awarded United Medical Devices the full $700,000 sought on its claim. United Medical Devices' principal Jimmy Esebag expressed his gratitude for the verdict: "Justice prevailed. The jury clearly saw through the story concocted by Playsafe's principals Iehab Hawatmeh and Fadi Nora. For this we are grateful."

Iehab Hawatmeh serves as the Chairman, President & CEO and Fadi Nora is a board member of CirTran Corporation.

I would expect the same outcome...

investorman85

04/06/16 2:41 PM

#32118 RE: Sparklefarkle #32110

If you are so sure about share price..I'll buy some now and sell it to you at half the price you say it is going to be. Bargin!! You in?? Hahah