Replies to post #9955 on KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[lesnshawn]

Popt: Exactly. It was best when it was trading, allowing myself and others to buy up the float. Since it finally did all get bought up, it was best that it went completely dark. AGAIN, we're told right here why it's a GOOD THING that KEYO NO LONGER TRADES! Afterall, w/ the float bought up and if the MM's did jack the price up, WAY UP, to try and entice some shares loose to fill their coffers back up, that would've looked very fishy.

6. What are the shell’s trading patterns in and during the transaction?
If shell management and their friends begin trading in and out of the stock before major announcements, this is not just their problem. The company itself could be sued on an “alter ego” theory of insider trading. This illustrates one of the advantages of working with a non-trading shell.

But, in the end, the MM's knew after all that time from 3/14 to 7/15 that they couldn't and weren't going to shake any shares loose and they wouldn't dare NSS this shell that strongly appears is going to be used by Dr.SS to take his Byzantine Empire public, just like FORBES investigation led him to conclude.

By all legal definitions, Keyon is a shell. More specifically, it's a NON-TRADING, NON-REPORTING public shell. Non-trading and non-reporting shells can and are used in RTM's. Why do you think this type of shell can't be used when these professionals in executing reverse mergers say it can be?

Keyon will never register again w/ the SEC. When the shell does re-register w/ the SEC it will actually be a new registration for the new public entity, NANT. That's just the way it works. The CCRA example should've taught you that.

BTW, miss this, Popt? http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121644734

So, what about that, Popt? Are you really prepared to tell those EFFI shareholders that those shares in their accounts that they bought and trade, they somehow don't exist because they were never registered w/ the SEC?

Your registration morph is so convoluted it defies logic.

ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
Does a car (stock) not exist unless it's first registered w/ the state? I'm looking at a car (stock) right now in my yard (account) that doesn't have an engine (trade). Does the car (stock) that I'm looking at not exist? Does that little sticker (registration) alone will that car (stock) into existence otherwise it's a figment of my imagination? If the car (stock) didn't exist in the first place, why and what is it I'm registering? Is it not a car (stock)? If it's not a car (stock), what is it?

lns