Replies to post #260591 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[ArchieK]

I continue to struggle with why people believe we shareholders are supposed to get up to the minute details of what management is doing, and in our self-imposed time frame. I'm assuming everyone here has at least one other investment...what do you hear from those companies? I think we're expecting something that is not realistic. I do agree it would be highly desirable but let's face it, these guys are on the low end of the communication scale already so what makes you think your pain in the SP will motivate them to suddenly flood us with info??

[eb0783]

You don't seem to be on top of what has been going on.

put all your eggs in one basket business strategy...which was, from the onset,extremely poor risk mamagement

You are really trying hard, cranking out the fud with statements like this. SUNRISE was the LEAD trial of the LEAD candidate and there has ALWAYS been numerous other trials going on both clinical (some were ISTs) and preclinical. On top of that, Avid has been growing nicely for years contributing more and more cash to the needed burn. Any time someone's lead phase III trial has issues, there is a researching, rethinking, replanning delay. There is no reason to spread fear....unless one has a reason.

[north40000]

I am grateful for your clarification of the term. I feared you were accusing AZN, MSK, Rutgers, Moffitt, KOLs or the concert of hospitals/clinical trial centers comprising NCCN of being "complicit" in some "nefarious" activity.