InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LegalObserver

04/01/16 5:28 PM

#3412 RE: hondobud #3411

Hondo, good point. However LAC had a relationship with POSCO before its relationship with WLC.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/lithium-americas-posco-begin-commercialization-230642330.html

Therefore LAC did not need WLC to get to POSCO, and ultimately a relationship with POSCO has not proven necessary either. The lack of squaring off an Agreement with SQM's lithium knowledge and POSCO's technology seems to hint to me that there was only room for one whale in this deal/company. To be clear, I am grateful for the merger because as one in this deal from the WLC side, I am not certain what I would be holding as a WLC shareholder without LAC's assets and deal.