InvestorsHub Logo

lesnshawn

03/30/16 1:11 PM

#9902 RE: Poptech #9901

Popt: That never happened. It's proven fact and the truth that Tom W. only VOLUNTARILY filed the cert of dissolution w/ the DE SOS in 5/22/14. It's total and complete fabrication to state that Soon-Shiong VOLUNTARILY filed to terminate all KEYON common shares in 2011. In fact, it's a outright lie to state they were terminated at all because they still exist in my brokerage accounts.

Same thing will happen here as happened with CCRA...



Again, it's already been noted that the way the forms were filled out and the reason checked are exactly the same. So...

If CCRA, why not KEYO? :-)

No reason except if one were to make things up as to why not. And, actually, Dr.SS using KEYO makes complete sense vs. a traditional IPO where he'd lose the control he has and it would cost him a lot for nothing because Dr.SS already told us he is well funded and doesn't need to go public for that reason. And, raising funds is the only reason to go public via a traditional WallSt./TBTF bank underwritten IPO.

Besides which, Dr.SS already told the world what his IPO Inspiration for NantHealth is and it is NOT to raise funds one-time via the proceeds from a traditional IPO. It is NOT to fund NantHealth directly. It's so a huge portion of NH shares will be used to fund the NantHealth Trust for years to come. Taking NantHealth public will enable that in a sustainable way.

Had NOTHING to do w/ 'going public' via a traditional IPO. NOTHING.

lns