InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ShizlDizl

03/25/16 10:07 AM

#11281 RE: TheDane #11280

They could be:

1) Using their money to make their privately held Nanobeak company, not the one you invested in, VNTH, more secure;

2) Showing that, as Doing Homework pointed out, they have money to do it;

3) Gearing up to have Nanobeak, not VNTH, make money off the product. VNTH shareholders make nothing, imo (agree, ptc?). Things may even get even better if we are limited to only profits made off of some small sliver of the market (like the non-consumer market in 3rd world countries, or some shyte like that that's money-wise worth nothing). That would fit VERY well with the idea that they are running the clinicals off VNTH while gearing up to send the potential money through private Nanobeak. Swell, eh?

4) Not posting any public info developments, like this one, for a reason, and it very much remains to be seen how that works.

imo that's all you're getting...more evidence of strategies that seem to have no benefit for unwarranted VNTH retail shareholders.

SD
icon url

gater

03/30/16 11:46 AM

#11300 RE: TheDane #11280

When I first saw it I was thinking Patent and not Trademark. So, to your point - it really means nothing.