InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zdog

03/20/16 10:48 AM

#6973 RE: Sputnik #6972

It has had one change, in that it has produced a small amount of revenue.
icon url

Nick Santa

03/20/16 11:25 AM

#6974 RE: Sputnik #6972

I don't blame you Sputnik. It's been a long, frustrating road for you and others. But the brutal truth is, back then this was not a good investment. Just a new tech that had promise. But there's a lot more needed to be successful. A solid mgmt team is one of them. So in that regard this company is new.

Products don't sell themselves, especially when the potential buyers need to be educated on the product that would benefit them. Doug has turned this around. A fresh perspective is probably what many long, LONG time investors need.

I brought this up the other day...l have followed several companies like this over the past few years. Great tech or product but poor mgmt. One has turned it around and the other is about to do the same. I see ITKG turning things around as well.
icon url

Gmsoich

03/20/16 1:22 PM

#6978 RE: Sputnik #6972

Thank you, Sputnik, for pointing out the difference between "startup" and "start over" .....and I would point out that integral has run out of time to be classified either way...