Replies to post #3442 on Arcam AB fka AMAVF

[charlie T colton]

RE: Yep, said it was posted 3 years ago

Yes, but GKN's 2015 annual report is less than a month old. This video is old but it looks like it's still on track.

3D printers open up new dimension

[pdb2]

You misunderstood what I was saying as I've appreciated, and told you so, the insight and info that you were providing.

My point, if you read carefully, was that given the 3 years since the article, and the article stated the only holdup on EBM was certification, was why haven't we heard more about this part being incorporated in the new planes and engines being released now. One would have expected if these parts were viable and being contemplated for commercialization that we would have heard some solid utilization news by now, 3 years after the article. Right???? All I asked was did any know the status of these developments 3 years later.

I did read trancon posts as well as all the other posts and with understanding. I don't like the wait, don't like any delay in arcam taking off which it will do if it gets more parts on the airplanes and engines. I don't trust or not trust your posts. I read them with interest if they provide new information and not just weak conclusions based on questionable data, like those that see competitors and dire circumstances in every video and PR. I've posted that I appreciate the info you provided and do not appreciate the tone of this post. I bought a lot more at 11/12 when others were stating that arcam would go to 10 and below and will get out when I determine it prudent and not when you advise me.

To sum up, no I don't like the wait but no I will not get out as I like the arcam story. Get it

[pdb2]

You misunderstood what I was saying as I've appreciated and told you so the insight and info that you were providing. But don't tell me what to do or when to sell I've bee bullish on Arcam and posted accordingly for years.

My point if you read with comprehension was that given the 3 years since the article, and the article stated the only holdup on EBM was certification, was why haven't we heard more about this part being incorporated in the new planes and engines being released now. One would have expected if these parts were viable and being contemplated for commercialization that we would have heard some solid utilization news by now 3 years after the article. Right???? All I asked was did any know the status of these developments 3 years later.

I did read trancon posts as well as all the other posts and with understanding. I don't like the wait, don't like any delay in arcam taking of which it will do if it gets more parts on the airplanes and engines. I don't trust or not trust your posts. I read them with interest if they provide new information and not just weak conclusions based on questionable data. I've posted that I appreciate the info you provided and do not appreciate the tone of this post. I bought a lot more at 11/12 when others were statin that arcam would go to 10 and below and will get out when I determine it prudent and not when you advise me.

To sum up, no I don't like the wait but no I will not get out as I like the arcam story. Get it