InvestorsHub Logo

lucky, mydog

02/28/16 11:41 AM

#65419 RE: JohnnieMoss #65418

we plan to continue our strategy of protecting our patented intellectual property rights."

lol. apparently that does not include those pesky shareholders.

riskreward007

02/28/16 11:54 AM

#65420 RE: JohnnieMoss #65418

This is Ronald Carters last public statement.

REVO's President, Ronald Carter says, "This is a major vindication for REVO and its shareholders. The settlement validates REVO's patents and also allows us to gain a new licensee through our agreement with Eyetalk365 LLC. It also proves and clearly demonstrates and substantiates the strength of our claims about the value, effectiveness and future of our patented technology. Through Eyetalk365 LLC, we plan to continue our strategy of protecting our patented intellectual property rights."



The problem for many REVO shareholders is that Ronald Carter's last public statement comes from a PR dated
April 17, 2015, -almost a year ago.

While Ronald Carter could provide much information on what is happening with REVO and clear up many misconceptions by simply COMMUNICATING WITH SHAREHOLDERS, he chooses NOT to do so.

This is no way to run a company IMHO.

Krysti

02/28/16 12:16 PM

#65421 RE: JohnnieMoss #65418

The problem is 'Honest' Ron's statements are unreliable.

REVO directors have admitted that their statements and accounts have been unreliable for many years.

So when we are gathering our intel on REVO do we want our view altered or do we want the record set straight with facts that come directly from REVO.

REVO has rarely issued facts.

Take, for example, the statement being relied upon here:

The settlement validates REVO's patents

That statement is simply untrue.

A court assessment and judgement on the merits is necessary for the patents to be validated. Settlements have prevented the courts considering the validity of the patents. The patents have never been considered by a court. They have never been validated.

The 'validation' of patents is one of 'Honest' Ron's unreliable statements.